http://www.monomorphic.org/wordpress/an-unusual-java-construct/ Nystrom re-presents Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:30:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://www.monomorphic.org/wordpress/an-unusual-java-construct/comment-page-1/#comment-81 johan Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:17:59 +0000 http://www.monomorphic.org/wordpress/?p=215#comment-81 Rich, this would indeed be a nice solution, but there are problems; 1) this code snippet looks for methods with identical signatures, but for equality, I may want a stricter condition than just that eventually, and 2) this snippet is called from a context where such an IMethod is not available, and creating it just to use it as an argument seems silly. But... it is not a bad suggestion. However I'm now rewriting a lot of this stuff in Scala, and I think it'll end up having a much more compact form when that's finished. Rich, this would indeed be a nice solution, but there are problems; 1) this code snippet looks for methods with identical signatures, but for equality, I may want a stricter condition than just that eventually, and 2) this snippet is called from a context where such an IMethod is not available, and creating it just to use it as an argument seems silly. But… it is not a bad suggestion.
However I’m now rewriting a lot of this stuff in Scala, and I think it’ll end up having a much more compact form when that’s finished.

]]> http://www.monomorphic.org/wordpress/an-unusual-java-construct/comment-page-1/#comment-80 Richard Hayden Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:32:46 +0000 http://www.monomorphic.org/wordpress/?p=215#comment-80 Surely even cleaner would simply be to override equals in IMethod, and you could even pass an IMethod into the function. Surely even cleaner would simply be to override equals in IMethod, and you could even pass an IMethod into the function.

]]>